A question answer community on a mission

to share Solutions for all STEM major Problems.

to share Solutions for all STEM major Problems.

Cant find a problem on ToughSTEM?

Solutions

0

The electrostatic force between two particles of charges q and Q separated by distance r is

F = kQq/r^2

where k is Coulomb's constant.

F1= F2

kQq1/r2^1 = kQq2/r2^2.

r1 = 0.596a - (-a) = 1.596a

r2 = a - 0.596a = 0.404a

q1/(1.596a))^2 = q2/(0.404a)^2

q1/q2 = (1.596/0.404)^2 = +15.606.

r1 = 2.30a - (-a) = 3.30a.

r2 = 2.30a - a = 1.30a.

q1/(3.30a)^2 = - q2/(1.30a)^2

q1/q2 = - (3.30/1.30)^2 = - 6.443.

NOTE: It does not make any difference to these answers whether the charge on Q is +ve or -ve. However, nothing has been mentioned about whether or not the arrangement is one of stable or unstable or neutral equilibrium. ie if particle 3 were moved slightly, would it tend to return to its equilibrium position, or move away from it?

In situation (a), if q1, q2 and Q are all +ve, then if particle 3 moves a little closer to particle 1 then it moves further away from particle 2, so the repulsion from particle 1 would increase while that from particle 2 would decrease. The net effect is a move back towards the position of equilibrium. This situation is stable.

However, if in situation (a) q1 & q2 are +ve while Q is -ve, a move of particle 3 towards particle 1 (and therefore away from particle 2) would increase the attraction from particle 1 while decreasing the attraction from particle 2. The net effect is an increase in the force towards particle 1, away from the equilibrium position. So this situation is unstable.

In situation (b), if particle 3 moves slightly further from particle 2 it will also be slightly further from particle 1. q1 & q2 have opposite signs, so particle 3 is attracted by one and repelled by the other. Both the attractive and repulsive forces will be reduced, but which will be reduced more?

Going back to the Coulomb force equation, F is proportional to 1/r^2. As r gets bigger, the the change in F for a given change in r gets smaller. (Look at the graph of F vs r.) So the force on particle 3 from the nearer charge (q1 or q2) will decrease more if particle 3 is moved further away. q2 is nearer, so the force from q2 will decrease more. To ensure that the net force on Q is back towards the equilibrium position, the force from q2 should be repulsive and that from q1 attractive. ie in order for this situation to be a position of stable equilibrium, Q should have the same sign as q2 (and the opposite sign to q1).

This argument also works out the same for a move of particle 3 towards the other two particles. The repulsion from q2 increases faster than the attraction from q1, so the net force on particle 3 is away from the other two, back towards the equilibrium position.

This analysis assumes that particle 3 is constrained to move on the x axis. If it can move in the y and z directions also, all positions of static equilibrium are unstable.

Added Thu, 09 Jul '15

Community

1

Add a Comment

Add Your Solution!

Close

Click here to

Choose An Image

or

Get image from URL

GO

Close

Back

Add Image

Close

What URL would you like to link?

GO

α

β

γ

δ

ϵ

ε

η

ϑ

λ

μ

π

ρ

σ

τ

φ

ψ

ω

Γ

Δ

Θ

Λ

Π

Σ

Φ

Ω

∫

∮

∞

∝

∇

∴

→

↔

⊆

⊂

∀

∃

∈

∉

∪

∩

∅

Copied to Clipboard

Sign Up

to interact with the community. (That's part of how we ensure only good content gets on ToughSTEM)

OR

OR

ToughSTEM is completely free, and its staying that way. Students pay way too much already.

Almost done!

Please **check your email** to finish creating your account!

Welcome to the Club!

Choose a new Display Name

Only letters, numbers, spaces, dashes, and underscores, are allowed. Can not be blank.

Great! You're all set, .

A question answer community on a mission

to share Solutions for all STEM major Problems.

to share Solutions for all STEM major Problems.

Why

The Purpose

The Purpose

How

The Community

The Community

Give Feedback

Tell us suggestions, ideas, and any bugs you find. Help make ToughSTEM even better.